Nomination by Acclamation Means a Ron Paul Third Party Run

Update 1 (5/11 00:15): Ben Swann has uncovered a memo from GOP legal council declaring all Convention candidates unbound.

Much has been made of the possibility of Ron Paul running as a third-party candidate either before or after the Republican Convention. “Will he or won’t he?” is what everybody asks.

The thing about Ron Paul is that he’s not hard to figure out. That’s what makes him such a reliable candidate. He plays by the rules, adheres to his principles, and stands his ground to protect them. The most difficult problem people have with this is accepting that ‘an honest politician’ isn’t an obligate oxymoron.

So, it’s hard to imagine Ron Paul doing anything else except playing by the rules within the Republican Party. He’s in the race through Tampa, because that’s what the rules provide for. He’s been following a delegates strategy for over a year, because that’s what the rules provide for (as of this writing, nine states look certain to nominate Dr. Paul from the floor). He won’t succumb to pressure to endorse Romney, because that’s not how the rules are written. And if Ron Paul loses the nomination at the convention, by the rules, fair-and-square, Ron Paul goes back to Lake Jackson and enjoys his time with his grandchildren.

Some speculators suggest that he’d never run Third-Party because that would damage Rand’s future chances, but he’s not one to put nepotism above principle. Others say he’d endorse Romney for an appointment at Treasury or Fed. Lobbyists already know that Dr. Paul cannot be bribed, and that’s not going to change at the pinnacle of his career. Everybody seems to assume that he has a breaking point at which he’s going to be bribed, but only because they project themselves onto him.

With Ron Paul gaining delegates steadily, to the point of Romney functionaries regularly insulting Paul delegates, circulating fake ballots, and perhaps engaging in illegal activity to deny voters representation in the State conventions, the Romney Camp is demonstrating through their actions that they have something to fear from the Paul campaign. Ignore their verbal dismissals and look at what’s actually happening on the ground. Romney’s not a stupid man, and he wouldn’t waste valuable campaign resources fighting Paul if he could save them to fight Obama.

The odds of a brokered convention are increasing every weekend. The chances of Romney picking up 1144 delegates before Tampa are falling just as quickly. The specter of Ron Paul delegates from winner-take-all states invoking Rule 38 on the first ballot is becoming more and more real every day. These are all being done, by-the-book and by-the-rules (much to the dismay of those who wrote them).

So, what can Romney do? Throw out the rules.

At the Democratic National Convention in 2008, Sen. Clinton called for a suspension of the rules and a nomination by acclamation for Barack Obama, bypassing the voting procedure, and she wound up as Secretary of State. Who would bet against Rick Santorum or Newt Gingrich making a similar deal?

No matter how loud the ‘Nays’ from the Ron Paul contingent from the floor, the Moderator of the convention can hear things differently, and so-declare it (despite the sound level meters Ron Paul delegates brought with them). There goes two years of campaigning and tens of millions of dollars, in five minutes.

OK, that summarizes the conventional wisdom to date. Now then, we have to ask, “what happens next?”

If the rules are thrown out, Ron Paul is no longer bound by those rules. Simply put, if Romney is nominated by acclamation, Ron Paul runs as a third-party candidate. And Romney can’t win an election against Barack Obama without the votes of those who would prefer to vote for Ron Paul. To win the nomination by skulduggery and deception is to lose the Presidency – and that’s a larger and more certain risk for Romney than to take his chances against Dr. Paul on a fair vote in Tampa.

Categories: government, liberty | 1 Comment

Optimal Seed Starting Mix Recipe

Since we’re working to get better production and economy on our organik* farm this year, I researched a few different sources for what would make the best seed starting and transplant mix. I’m doing most of our farming this year based on Brett Markham’s book Mini Farming: Self-Sufficiency on 1/4 Acre but a few of his ingredient suggestions were a bit pricey. Still, his recipe is very similar to one I used last year that was based on advice from some garden forum online (and did work well). I went looking to see what else was out there (OK, I lost last year’s recipe too) and I found this paper from Cornell which looked systematically at various combinations of nutrients and came up with a clear winner which did far better than all of the other options.

Their paper switches back and forth between various percents of volumes and ratios and lbs-per-cubic-yards (quick, how many quarts are in a cubic yard?) so I sat down to do the math (hopefully I did it right, corrections welcome) to come up with a recipe that would scale more closely to our first planting and be near amounts that can be easily purchased at the local garden center. Without further ado, the recipe:

5 gallons vermicompost (worm castings)
3 gallons vermiculite
3 gallons perlite
14 gallons peat moss
2 c blood meal (dried blood)
1 c green sand
2 c bone meal (not pelletized)
2/3 c garden lime (pulverized not pellitized)

All this adds up to 1/8th of a cubic yard of starting mix. To help with shopping, 5 gallons of vermicompost is 1 bag from the garden center. 3 gallons of vermiculite and/or perlite is about a bag and a half of the size they sell at Walmart. 14 gallons of peat moss is somewhere around half a 2.2 cubic foot bale at Walmart. The blood meal and bone meal can be had at Walmart but the greensand has to be purchased from a garden center. The garden lime also came from Walmart (our local fancy garden center charges 250% of the prices at the big box stores for similar items, but if yours does better, might as well get it all in one trip). The blood meal and the bone meal come in bags big enough for ~4 recipes. The lime and greensand probably have enough to make 50 recipes. Those two are ancient stones, so they should last for years – just keep them dry.

To buy all of that around here cost about $85. The second to fourth batches would cost about $40, and then the fifth batch would cost about $60. It works out to about $400 a cubic yard doing it this way, which isn’t a good idea if you’re doing this in volume. Around here a cubic yard of seed starter mix goes for about $150 though with ingredients Cornell found to not be helpful (so what is the true value?). $200 of my cost is the worm castings, though, which I should be able to generate on the farm practically for free, so once that is going the real cost should be closer to $200/cu yard which is probably OK for an optimal seed starting mix. Even at the full price, it’s cheaper than buying Miracle Grow starting mix at the big box store if you’re doing any kind of volume.

We were surprised how much less of the amendments this recipe calls for than the one we used from online last year. But if the Cornell folks say this works, I’m happy to stretch the budget further (save the rest for the 2nd planting of the season!). Just because last year’s mix had enough of the nutrients doesn’t mean it didn’t have way more than was needed. Time will tell.

I plan to make planting blocks with this mix, using this soil blocker. The basic idea is you wet it down to an oatmeal-like consistency, make the blocks, and then let them dry. Then you plant right in the soil block and plant the block right in the ground, with nothing to constrict the roots.

Two caveats then: first, this mix is intended to go from seed to transplant because I’m only using the medium soil blocker. Next year we might use some farmstand revenue to buy the mini-soil-blocker, which lets you start more blocks for just the sprouting stage, then move them to a medium block if they germinate and start to sprout. This is theoretically more efficient, and this mix then might be better for the transplants than the initial seed starting in that case. There shouldn’t be a real need for the soil amendments in the first week or so.

Second, the Cornell study was focused on tomato plants, and certainly we’ll be growing many tomatoes but we’re also growing other plants. It’s possible that a better mix might be available for other plant types. But, like I said, we used a similar mix last year for everything and had no trouble.

I’ll update this post later on with some pictures and a report on how the mix did for us.

* screw you USDA for stealing a word from the people

Categories: farm | Leave a comment

It’s the Economy Stupid (2012)

Categories: economics, government | Tags: , , , , | Leave a comment

Long-Haired Hippie Freaks

Categories: Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Slicing and Dicing the NH Gay Marriage Repeal (HB437) Vote

The attempted repeal of gay marriage in NH has failed.  Here are a few ways to slice the roll call vote:

Party Votes

Democrats voting against gay marriage*: 1 (Roger Berube of Sommersworth)

Democrats voting for gay marriage: 92

Republicans voting against gay marriage: 115

Republicans voting for gay marriage: 119

Vote Switching

The votes above and the votes  that are reported in the news are of the final vote on ITL.  There were several previous votes, including a simple vote on whether the repeal ought to pass.  There were 17 21 reps who voted for the repeal but then voted to kill the bill.  There are two reasons to do this.   One is pragmatic – since the vote to pass the bill already failed, why not vote to kill it?  That’s the procedural thing to do.  The other reason could be clever political maneuvering – the vote that gets reported is the last one and conceivably a Rep. can be on both sides of the bill come November, depending on the audience.  Here are the switchers:

This first group voted against the repeal, but then voted to not kill the bill.  One supposes they wanted more debate or an amendment?  I don’t think these are particularly meaningful.

 

Belvin, William Republican Hillsborough 6
Chirichiello, Brian Republican Rockingham 5
Davenport, Joshua Republican Rockingham 12
Flanders, Donald Republican Belknap 4
Hunt, John Republican Cheshire 7
Johnson, Jane Republican Cheshire 6
Kingsbury, Robert Republican Belknap 4
Packard, Sherman Republican Rockingham 3
Pilliod, James Republican Belknap 5
Ritter, Glenn Republican Rockingham 14

 

This next group is the more interesting one: Reps who voted ‘against gay marriage’ before they voted ‘for’ it:

 

Bradley, Lester Republican Grafton 4 Yea
Brown, Julie Republican Strafford 1 Yea
Coffey, James Republican Hillsborough 3 Yea
Devine, James Republican Rockingham 7 Yea
Eaton, Stephanie Republican Grafton 1 Yea
Emerton, Larry Republican Hillsborough 7 Yea
Erickson, Duane Republican Hillsborough 25 Yea
Graham, John Republican Hillsborough 18 Yea
Hagan, Joseph Republican Rockingham 7 Yea
Hawkins, Kenneth Republican Hillsborough 18 Yea
Katsakiores, Phyllis Republican Rockingham 5 Yea
Malone, Robert Republican Belknap 5 Yea
McGuire, Dan Republican Merrimack 8 Yea
Newton, Clifford Republican Strafford 1 Yea
Parsons, Robbie Republican Strafford 3 Yea
Proulx, Mark Republican Hillsborough 15 Yea
Reilly, Harold Republican Grafton 8 Yea
Remick, William Republican Coos 2 Yea
Sanders, Elisabeth Republican Rockingham 7 Yea
Terrio, Ross Republican Hillsborough 14 Yea
Vita, Carol Republican Strafford 3 Yea

 

By the simple tally of the final vote, one would conclude that a majority of Republicans voted to protect gay marriage in NH. But by including those who first voted to remove gay marriage, it becomes clear that a majority of voting Republican Reps. in NH are against gay marriage.

Adding in the vote switchers, in both directions ( counting those who voted ‘nay’ on OTP then ‘nay’ on ITL as ‘for’ and those who voted ‘yay’ on OTP then ‘yay’ on ITL as ‘against’, for +- 11), yields:

Republicans who voted against gay marriage: 126

Republicans voting for gay marriage: 108

I think this is a more correct tally than just the ITL vote. I’ve said it before and I’ll say it again – without a veto-proof majority, this whole exercise on the Republicans’ part was a gift to the Democrats come November. Gay rights aside, they betray their political futures and their constituents by choosing to give up seats in November.

Liberty Rep. Votes

OK, that’s now the whole house voted – how about the pro-liberty reps (as defined by the top-25 spots on the 2011 NHLA Liberty Rating)?

Name District Town Grade Vote
Brown, Paul Rockingham 2 Raymond A+ Pro Gay Marriage
Cohn, Seth Merrimack 6 Canterbury A+ Pro Gay Marriage
DeJong, Cameron Hillsborough 9 Manchester A Pro Gay Marriage
Greazzo, Phil Hillsborough 17 Manchester A Pro Gay Marriage
Malone, Robert Belknap 5 Alton Bay A Pro Gay Marriage
Maltz, Jonathan Hillsborough 27 Hudson A Pro Gay Marriage
Murphy, Keith Hillsborough 18 Bedford A Pro Gay Marriage
Newton, Clifford Strafford 1 Rochester A Pro Gay Marriage
Sanborn, Laurie Merrimack 5 Henniker A Pro Gay Marriage
Seaworth, G. Brian Merrimack 7 Pembroke A+ Pro Gay Marriage
Simmons, Tammy Hillsborough 18 Manchester A Pro Gay Marriage
Tasker, Kyle Rockingham 1 Northwood A Pro Gay Marriage
Vaillancourt, Steve Hillsborough 15 Manchester A+ Pro Gay Marriage
Manuse, Andrew Rockingham 5 Derry A No Vote
Warden, Mark Hillsborough 7 Goffstown A+ No Vote
Holden, Frank Hillsborough 4 Lyndeborough A- Excused
Okerman, Richard Rockingham 4 Windham A Excused
Bowers, Spec Sullivan 3 Georges Mills A Anti Gay Marriage
DeLemus, Susan Strafford 1 Rochester A Anti Gay Marriage
Giuda, J. Brandon Merrimack 7 Chichester A Anti Gay Marriage
Jones, Kyle Strafford 1 Rochester A+ Anti Gay Marriage
Jones, Laura Strafford 1 Rochester A Anti Gay Marriage
McGuire, Dan Merrimack 8 Epsom A Anti Gay Marriage**
Tregenza, Norman Carroll 2 Silver Lake A Anti Gay Marriage
Vita, Lucien Strafford 3 Middleton A Anti Gay Marriage

Do with it what you will.

* The actual vote was a yay/nay vote on an ITL (inexpedient to legislate) measure, which means it should not become law, on a bill to repeal gay marriage. So a ‘yay’ vote is a vote for not enacting a repeal of gay marriage. So, a for-against-against vote is for gay marriage since the double-negatives cancel out. Just so that’s clear to right-minded humans, it’s simplified above.

** vote for OTP before ITL

 

Update 1: 2012-03-23:23:52 – added vote-switchers
Update 2: 2012-03-24:00:46 – fixed switcher count

Categories: government, New Hampshire | 1 Comment

Iran’s Nuclear Ambitions as of February 2012

US intelligence consensus view:

“Recent assessments by American spy agencies are broadly consistent with a 2007 intelligence finding that concluded that Iran had abandoned its nuclear weapons program years earlier, according to current and former American officials. The officials said that assessment was largely reaffirmed in a 2010 National Intelligence Estimate, and that it remains the consensus view of America’s 16 intelligence agencies.”

Israeli intelligence says:

“…while Iran continues to improve its nuclear capabilities, it has not yet decided whether to translate these capabilities into a nuclear weapon – or, more specifically, a nuclear warhead mounted atop a missile. Nor is it clear when Iran might make such a decision.”

Compare and contrast with the rhetoric of three of the four Republican Presidential candidates:

Mitt Romney:

Look, one thing you can know and that is if we reelect Barack Obama, Iran will have a nuclear weapon…it’s worth putting in place crippling sanctions. It’s worth working with the insurgents in the country to encourage regime change in the country. And if all else fails, if after all of the work we’ve done, there’s nothing else we could do besides mil — take military action, then of course you take military action.

Rick Santorum:

“Any foreign scientists working in Iran on this nuclear program will be termed an enemy combatant and will be subject − like any other enemy combatant, like Osama bin Laden − to being taken out by the United States government as a threat to this country,”

Newt Gingrich:

“I would also point out that a Gingrich presidency would communicate publicly to the Iranians that if they continue to do what they’re doing, they should expect to get hit, and it will be their fault for having caused it.”

And, just for completeness:

Ron Paul:

“I’m afraid what’s going on right now is similar to the war propaganda that went on against Iraq. And you know they didn’t have weapons of mass destruction and it was orchestrated and it was, to me, a tragedy of what’s happened these past — last 10 years, the death and destruction, $4 billion — $4 trillion in debt. So no, it’s not worthwhile going to war. If you do, you get a declaration of war and you fight it and you win it and get it over with.”

Categories: government | Leave a comment

im in ur homes adjusting ur clocks

Categories: economics, government | Leave a comment

Sprouted Whole Grain Wheat Flour Bread

sprouted-loaves

I got a 2-lb bag of Lindley Mills’ SuperSprout Sprouted Whole Grain Wheat Flour (from King Arthur Flour) on a lark, and boy am I glad I did.  This flour is amazing.

The texture is so fine – almost like a brownie box mix.  As a benchmark, I used my standard bread flour loaf bread recipe with the whole bag of flour:

2-lb bag SuperSprout
1 1/2 c buttermilk
5/8 c water
4T honey
2T butter
4t yeast
3t sea salt

(it needed more water than bread flour), and made six mini-loaves in a silicone baking pan (35 min at 350).  It came out better than any white bread or whole grain bread I’ve made to date.  The rise was perfect, the texture was perfect, the dough bounced back perfectly after the second rise, and I didn’t even kneed it all that much (the 5-year-old boy had that job).  I suspect this flour would make a nice pizza dough as well.

The first mini-loaf was gone before I could get the stew on the table – just the warm bread and buttery spread was sufficient for the hungry family to demolish.  Fortunately this bread cuts really easily too.

I’ve had sprouted-grain crackers and such before, and this flour doesn’t taste anything like that.  Perhaps a little bit like spelt, but much nicer, and somebody eating a loaf of this bread will just think it’s wonderful wheat bread.  If this flour goes into mass production, it could really change the way the average person bakes bread at home – I have to spend much more time and effort to get standard flours to perform not quite as well as this one does with ease.

Besides all that, the manufacturer says it’s easier for people who have wheat intolerance to digest.

Categories: recipes | Leave a comment

Testimony for HB 1531 (NH 2012)

HB1531 – 2012

Relative to prosecution for victimless crimes.

February 9th, 2012

Written testimony of:

Bill McGonigle

251 Croydon Turnpike
Plainfield

603.448.1668

bill@mcgonigle.us

Good afternoon, Madam Chair, members of the Committee:

I’m Bill McGonigle of Plainfield, and I am here today to testify in favor of HB1531.

I’m sure you’ll hear many important points today – about how Government is instituted to protect us from each other, that Just Government arises from the concent of the governed, and how the natural right of defense enables a Just Government to provide for the mutual defense. Our Constitution has specific requirements for just incarceration, namely to reform.

These are all good points, and true, however, I wish to add a slightly different perspective, from perhaps a more pragmatic angle. I will focus on that point and try to be brief.

I would like to bring to the Committee’s attention the incarceration rate in New Hampshire and illustrate how it compares to some other States and Countries around the world.

According to the standard measure, New Hampshire imprisons 220 individuals per 100,000 residents. That number in isolation has little meaning.


For comparison, Massachusetts has an incarceration rate of 218 per 100,000 – pretty similar. Yet, who would suggest that the level of crime is Massachusetts is similar to that in New Hampshire?

Further down the list we’ll find Minnesota at 179 and Maine at 151, but not before we pass the narco states of Mexico and Columbia, and Saudi Arabia and Turkey. To be fair, in Saudi Arabia, one might think the execution rates might keep the incarceration rate down, but Turkey hasn’t executed anybody since 1984.

Next we find Australia at 133, then Canada at 117, but not before passing the repressive regime of China at 122. France at 109 marks half the incarceration rate of New Hampshire. At this point we should stop to ask if New Hampshire is a place with twice the criminal activity of France. Below the half-way point we find Italy, Austria, Germany, Ireland, Switzerland, and Norway, then Finland below the 1/3 mark. All of these countries have abolished capital punishment.

So, what’s going on here? To be sure, New Hampshire isn’t the worst offender among the United States, and the US rate at the Federal level is much worse. But there’s clearly a problem here – New Hampshiremen aren’t somehow more evil than their European counterparts, and these European States aren’t suffering from rampant crime waves that we’re somehow avoiding with our overflowing prisons (as an aide: this is something to consider in light of County-level controversies about having to build new, larger prisons).

But perhaps incarceration rates correlate with reduced crime, so the State has a vested interest in such high levels? Again, this can be shown to be untrue by way of comparison. For example, when comparing crime rates between New Hampshire and Switzerland, major crime indicators are very close in scale (I have a data table in my written testimony with some figures for comparison). The similarity of the crime numbers between New Hampshire and Switzerland is likely more illustrative of a universal aspect of human nature than an effect of particular legal systems.

Because other Western countries prosecute victimless crimes less, they don’t have staggeringly different crime levels than New Hampshire, and the magnitude of the incarceration rate is shown here to not significantly reduce crime, we must consider the effectiveness of our incarceration rates, and the prosecution of, and imprisonment for, victimless crimes.

Now, it’s possible that the Legislature could spend the next twenty years going through the State’s Statutes with a fine-toothed comb to find all of the offending Statutes, and that’s probably a good idea anyway. Whether that kind of long-term project can actually be accomplished in a political environment where control of the Legislature tends to flip every four years and the parties tend to abandon the projects of the other guys – I’d like to think it could happen but I’m not really sure.

But in the meantime, this Legislature has the responsibility to ensure than injustice is not being brought upon the People of New Hampshire. With our existing Statutes, over that same 20-year period it’s very likely that the State will imprison hundreds if not thousands of individuals for committing so-called ‘crimes’ that have no victim, and it won’t reduce crime rates or protect other people. HB 1531 offers a way out of this bind by allowing defendants to offer, as a defense, that the alleged crime had no victim.

Besides saving the taxpayers a tremendous amount of money by not prosecuting and incarcerating all these individuals unnecessarily, it would start us down the path of bringing New Hampshire in line with more appropriate crime-control measures, as established empirically by the example of the entirety of the rest of the Western World.

HB1531 doesn’t instantly solve all of our problems – and I like to think it would be a stop-gap measure until our Statutes can be straightened out – but it does give the People of New Hampshire a realistic chance at a fair shake at Justice in our State, and as I hope I’ve shown here today, it does so without the risk of increased levels of crime.

Thank you for your time, and I’d be happy to answer any questions the Committee might have.

Incarceration Rates (per 100,000)

New Hampshire

220

Massachusetts

218

Mexico

200

Colombia

181

Minnesota

179

Saudi Arabia

178

Turkey

168

Maine

151

Australia

133

China

122

Canada

117

France

109

Italy

110

Austria

104

Greece

101

Republic of Ireland

95

Germany

87

Switzerland

79

Sweden

78

Norway

73

Finland

59

Japan

58

Syria

58

Pakistan

40

India

31

Crime Rates (per 100,000)

Murder

Rape

Assault

Robbery

Burglary

New Hampshire

1.00

31.3

100.4

34.3

413.3

Switzerland

0.65

6.94

127.79

36.46

641.64

Sources:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_incarceration_rate

http://www.disastercenter.com/crime/nhcrime.htm

http://www.bfs.admin.ch/bfs/portal/fr/index/themen/19/03/02/key/02/straftaten_im_einzelnen.html

 

Categories: economics, government, New Hampshire | Leave a comment

Why New Hampshire has all the Businesses

If you drive up and down the Connecticut River, you’ll notice most of the businesses are in New Hampshire (which employ many Vermonters).  Here’s why.

tax rate chart

Categories: economics, government, New Hampshire | Leave a comment