The way the 2011 proposed NH right-to-work legislation is written, its effect is to remove from a private employer the right to exclusively contract with a union to provide employees. The employer would hereafter be forced to hire non-union workers alongside union workers, even if that’s not the employer’s decided strategy.
I think to support this you have to assume that a private worker has a right to a job at a private employer under the employee’s terms and that the State has to step in to enforce that. The State is acting like a violent union here.
I wish the legislation had been written to actually prevent unions from being able to demand donations of its members to political action committees against their interests, but as it’s written, it looks like an anti-liberty bill to me. In essence, it’s the State interfering in the right of private contract, for what it thinks are sound social-engineering reasons.
People I respect tell me, “yeah, but it’s the best way to achieve the greater good.” This violates my “the means are everything,” guiding principle. Try harder next time.