Continue reading »" />
browser icon
You are using an insecure version of your web browser. Please update your browser!
Using an outdated browser makes your computer unsafe. For a safer, faster, more enjoyable user experience, please update your browser today or try a newer browser.

Is the new Boy Scouts of America Membership Policy “Morally Straight”?

Posted by on 2013/05/27

“How can the Boy Scouts admit gay youth?  Doesn’t the Scout Oath require them to be ‘morally straight’?” some ask.

It does, and it has since 1911.

“So how can the Boy Scouts admit gay youth – they’re not straight?”

First things first – the use of the word ‘straight’ to mean ‘heterosexual’ was first used thirty years after the Scout Oath was adopted by the BSA.

So, it is impossible that the Scout Oath meant ‘heterosexual’ when it was adopted.  Sexuality is not and never has been part of Scouting.

“So, if ‘morally straight’ doesn’t mean ‘heterosexual’, what does it mean?”

Simply put, it means living one’s life in adherence to one’s morals.

“So, then, what are the morals of the Boy Scouts of America?”

That one is easy – they are established by the Scout Oath and the Scout Law.  Beyond that, a Scout’s morals are established by his community, religion, and personal moral code.  To be morally straight, a Scout will abide by his moral code.  The particulars of that code will vary according to his place, his faith, and personal beliefs.

Boy Scouts, as an organization, is non-sectarian.  It does not impose any requirements on a youth beyond the Scout Oath and Law, but it does require the Scout to live up to his own morals.  It’s a reminder to the Scout to never stray from his principles, a guide that will serve him well throughout his life.

Certainly, there are differences among the worlds’ religions.  A Jewish Scout may not be permitted to eat pork, while a Catholic Scout may be a happy consumer of bacon.  Scouting does not require the Jewish Scout to eat bacon, nor the Catholic Scout to abstain from bacon for the Jewish Scout’s sake, but it does require both Scouts to be ‘reverent’ and to respect the teachings of each others’ religions.  He doesn’t have to follow those teachings, but he has to respect that the other Scout follows them.  Tolerance of every Scout’s religion is simply the only way for an organization like the Boy Scouts to be viable.

In regards to homosexuality, some of the world’s religions don’t address the subject at all.  In the Abrahamic religions, Leviticus forbids many things, including homosexuality and the eating of certain foods; those who observe the Kosher tradition abide by these rules.  Most Christian traditions consider Mark 7:15 to reverse the prohibition on those foods from Leviticus, and some denominations feel that the literal text of Mark 7:15 also removes the prohibition on homosexuality.  Some denominations further cite Matthew 19:12 as clarifying Jesus’s stance on homosexuals and as such they welcome homosexuals into their churches.  Other denominations strongly disagree, and so there is religious controversy as to which Bible verses mean what, and how they should be properly interpreted.

Boy Scouts of America does not take a position on the interpretation of any Bible verses.  It is explicitly non-sectarian and only requires that Scouts and Scouters be ‘reverent’ towards theirs and other religions, while abiding by their own moral codes.

Some Scouters (for the most part not Scouts) are currently upset that the most recent change in BSA policy is no longer in line with their own religion’s teachings.  This is certainly true in many cases, and one can understand the challenge a Scouter faces when the BSA’s policy changes from directly supporting a teaching of his own church to requiring the Scouter to be instead tolerant of others’ churches’ teachings.  Though perhaps difficult, that same Scouter can take solace knowing that the new BSA Membership Standards policy is more clearly in line with the Scout Oath and Law that than previous policy was.  Scouters are encouraged to continue continue to help other people at all times, and to always be Helpful, Friendly, Courteous, Kind, Brave, and Reverent.

2 Responses to Is the new Boy Scouts of America Membership Policy “Morally Straight”?

  1. Anon

    Be careful with your use of the word “some.” It’s can be misleading…..
    just a side thought that really hasn’t hit the media much yet. Do you know what the last word of the original scout law description was from the original manual. Last word in the description under CLEAN. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scout_Law – check it out
    to make a policy for all is to decide for all what morally straight means or at least what it can’t mean now. We can leave the policies how they were and discriminate against a minority or we can protect the minorities moral code and discriminate against the moral code of a majority group. The scouts can change as they vote I suppose. If they do they show little loyalty to their own scouting heritage or the morals of the large majority of Christian religions. Morals and Principle generally shouldn’t change over time. Many religions are created simply so they can “affirm” one single thing. Many religions that have subgroups that deny homosexuality as a sin are split from head to toe over the issue as well. I say we stay true to our original intent and heritage.

    Tyranny of the majority is in conflict with most of the Scout Law. Scouting does not need to discriminate against any moral system that is not in conflict with the Law. Many of our Scouters need to learn tolerance. -Bill P.S. leaving fake names and contact URL’s isn’t an example of being Trustworthy. Greets to the anonymous South Carolina commenter.

  2. Anon

    I owe you an apology. You have requested that participation in your blog be accompanied by contact info which I have withheld. Whatever my motives I still wish to maintain privacy when I communicate online. So my first request is to be allowed to do this. If you decline, I see nothing wrong with you not accepting my comments or deleting previous ones. Your space, your rules. I hope you see this as a more trustworthy approach.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>